Thank you for your feedback on this potential enhancement. We are currently reviewing this request, and gathering additional information. In the meantime, please continue to provide more feedback and we welcome your votes! We will keep the status updated of the project update here. Happy voting, all!Doug Kariel supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the commentDoug Kariel commented
I really like this idea. Having records for books that we already have and new ones interspersed makes the loading process very time consuming.
It would be best to have 2 files. One with updated records and one with records for books that are new to collection.
If there are new records for the same book, we should know what has been changed.